1.
Briefly summarize the plot of the novel you read according to the elements of
plot you've learned in past courses (exposition, inciting incident,
etc.). Explain how the narrative fulfills the author's purpose (based on
your well-informed interpretation of same).
Catch- 22 does not
follow the traditional elements of plot. Although through out reading the
readers do find an exposition, inciting incident, climax and falling action,
there is no necessary order to where they are placed in. Readers will find one
chapter talking about how Yossarian has to complete 60 missions while in few
chapters later he will have to complete 55 missions. I think the point the
author was trying to get across was how people who are in the wars see the war
as opposed to the people who stand and watch the wars. The exposition is
introduced through meeting the many different characters and towards the ¾ of the book where Yossarian has to fly a
small amount of missions. The readers learn about Catch-22, which is in theory
that there’s no way out of a situation, unless you commit the act of death.
Throughout the book, every time Yossarian tries to go home after completing his
missions, the mission number goes up, which makes Yossarian more miserable. The
climax would have to be when Korn and Cathcart offer a solution that Yossarian
ultimately declines. As a conclusion, Yossarian deserts the army and tries to
find a way to Sweden to escape the war.
2.
Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid cliches.
The
theme of the story is that there is always a catch, hence Catch-22. As seen
throughout the story, Yossarian is constantly trying to find the loophole of
leaving his stay in the military. Unfortunately, there was no guarantee of a
leave, which left Yossarian being one of the most sane people in a place full
of insane people. Along with that theme could be the added fact that death is
the only option out. In order for Yossarian to have left he must have been
insane to stay in ward so he could be benched or he would have to die.
3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).
3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).
Joseph
Heller told the story through a satirical tone to display the irony of the
whole war situation going on. For example, when Yossarian was told about the
Catch-22 dilemma, the situation of Yossarian turned into a pointless discussion
instead of focusing on the real problem going on which was why the soldiers
couldn’t leave their base when there were eager men back home who would “love”
to be fighting.
Also,
the situation where Yossarian has to pretend to be the dead soldier, Guiseppe,
for his family and at the same time jokes around at the situation shows Heller
poking fun at the idea of death. In addition, there is the character named
Major Major Major Major who is a joke in himself. The fact that his name was a
joke started by his father and how he was only promoted to being a major
because he looked like Henry Forda added to the sheer satirical tone of the
author. Another example is how Lieutenant Scheisskopf name in German means
sh*thead (courtesy to Dr. Preston). In the book, the Lieutenant acts just like
his name and no one enjoys his presence because of how two-faced he could be.
4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)
4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)
- Dramatic
Irony: There are a few moments in the book where the actions such as Yossarian
pretending to be an alive soldier, with the family having no clue but the
audience does, which the author uses sporadically throughout the book. (Page
229-230)
- Foreshadowing: Since the story
does not follow the traditional plot structure, the readers read a mix of
things that have already happened, that may happen, or that are happening. (Page
63.)
- Diction: A lot of the words used
through out Catch – 22 are vocabulary words I’ve seen through out my
years in high school. Some are even from current vocabulary lists that I’m
studying in class. Knowing these words
adds a higher understanding to the text. (Page 247)
- Aphorism: This term is also used
various times through out the book, especially to enhance the satirical tone of
the book. An exemplary phrase from Catch-22 is “There was so much
unhappiness in the world… and there was nothing he could do about anybody’s”
(page 258)
- Dialogue: Most of Catch-22
is filled with dialogue, which really develops a good sense of flow in the
book. Dialogue really captures the essence of the situation, for example there
is a part where Dobbs wants to kill several of his own military members and
he’s waiting for Yossarians approval but Yossarian can’t choke out the words so
that convinces Dobbs. (Page 282)
- Black Comedy: This technique is
also prominently shown in Catch-22 with dialogue between characters. An
example is when Milo tries to convince Yossarian that his cotton ball chocolate
is good for the soldiers. This event in the book is funny in a dumbstruck way
but also concerning because of effects of the chocolate cotton ball. (page 330)
- Telling Detail: There are a
myriad of characters in Catch-22 but some characters actions speak louder
than words. Telling detail is basically when language or visual element tells a
lot about a character’s character. An example is how the people see the
chaplain and how he really sees himself through his though process of missing
his family. (Page 336)
- Paradox: Paradoxes are especially
used throughout the book to emphasis the author’s intention of telling the
story. For example when the chaplain hangs around the drunken people at the bar
to get them to believe in god. To see a holy man in a place so sinful really
questions the chaplains actions of why he was really there. (Page 352)
- Motif: The motif of Catch-22
is obvious, the whole story revolves around this idea of catch-22, which is the
idea that there really are no ways out despite being given two options.
- Ambiguity: There are actions in the book that
really make the readers question what is the author trying to convey. An
example is when Yossarian talks to Major Sanderson about his “fish dream” which
then takes a sudden turn for the odd of the subject. (page 368)
5 comments:
Good job. Your use of literary elements show that you understand the book.
I enjoyed your lit analysis on Catch 22. I never had the time or interest in reading it but now after reading your take on it, I sure do! Perfect examples to back up those literary elements and fairly descriptive plot gist of the book!
Thanks guys (:
Just like Danny said, I never had the interest of reading this book until now. I feel that your summary of Catch 22 has kindled an interest in this book! You did a great job with your literary analysis despite the fact that you did the read the book to the end! Great job Miranda!!
P.S. I love feeding your fishes!! (:
I like your input for each literary element; it does bring a whole new understanding of the book especially when you analyzed it that way! I have never heard of Catch-22, but now I plan on reading it!
Post a Comment